Living boundary
Consent requires a legible interface and protection against boundary collapse.
Layer 3 grounded into Layers 0–1
Consentocracy is a Layer-3 normative charter grounded in—but not identical to—the Quantum Invariants descriptive spine.
Grounding map
The map avoids two errors: pretending structural descriptions are moral commands, and making moral commands without modeling boundaries, capacity, feedback, accounting, power, and reversibility.
Consent requires a legible interface and protection against boundary collapse.
A consent claim depends on meaningful capacity and right-sized legibility.
Authorization requires capacity, scope, comprehension, and revisability.
Witness must preserve accountable meaning without collapsing the observed boundary.
Flows across boundaries require mutually reconcilable accounting.
Stable consent is recursively reviewed without converting trust into capture.
Operational comparators must not silently become constitutional.
Impact and irreversibility determine the required repair and exit architecture.
Governance burden increases with reach, asymmetry, externality, and irreversibility.
Dignity, consent, boundary, and repair outrank operational metrics.
Impact and accounting boundaries must align.
Binary paper consent obscures structural coercion.
Visibility without scoped consent shifts agency to the observer.
Required separation
“Quantum Invariants describes recurring structural dynamics. Consentocracy declares which comparators and return paths must govern power affecting beings.”The grounding relationship is explicit so neither layer silently impersonates the other.